Connect with us

News

Comey on Hillary: Maybe I wouldn’t say “extreme carelessness” today

Published

on

First we took a look at what James Comey had to say about Donald Trump. What about Hillary Clinton, the other major-party presidential candidate his FBI investigated during the 2016 election cycle? ABC News chief anchor George Stephanopoulos offers up opportunities for Comey to respond to critics that he didn’t get tough enough with the Democratic nominee, a point which Comey doesn’t quite rebut.

Comey tells Stephanopoulos that he didn’t want to say “gross negligence” about Hillary Clinton’s use of private e-mail server for transmission of hundreds of classified documents, because it hewed too close to the statute under which she should have been charged. On the other hand, Comey wishes he’d come up with a better formulation than “extreme carelessness” to describe the chronic mishandling of communications during Clinton’s time as Secretary of State:

GEORGE STEPHANOPOULOS: Y– you– you cited her for extreme carelessness. In an original draft of your statement– the words, “Gross negligence” were there instead of “Extreme carelessness.” And– and President Trump’s allies say that’s a sign that you personally went easy on her.

JAMES COMEY: Yeah, I don’t. All these allies who think I went easy on her have a hard time explaining so why did I do what I did in October, but I’ll stay in July. I wasn’t trying to go easy on her or hard on her. I was trying to be honest and clear with the American people. What she did was really sloppy.

Not– you know, there’s all the time people mishandle a classified document or maybe have one conversation on email that they shouldn’t. This was over the course of four years, dozens of conversations on email about secret topics. And I think eight about top secret topics. So this is more than just ordinary sloppiness.

So if I’m going to be honest, I have to say somehow it’s more than ordinary sloppiness. So my first draft, which I wrote myself, said, “Gross negligence.” It’s a lawyer term. And the reason I used that term is I wanted to also explain that I don’t mean that in the sense that a statute passed 100 years ago means it. And then my staff convinced me that that’s just going to confuse all kinds of people, if you start talking about statutes and what the words mean. What’s a colloquial way to explain it? And elsewhere in my statement I had said, “Extremely careless.” And so they said, “Just use that.” And so that’s what I went with.

GEORGE STEPHANOPOULOS: And to Hillary Clinton supporters, that sounded like you’re accusing her of a crime even though you don’t prosecute.

JAMES COMEY: Yeah, I get that. And then the other said saying, “You’re admitting she committed a crime, you didn’t prosecute her.” The goal was– and– and one of the mistakes I made is I don’t know what it would be. I should’ve worked harder to find a way to convey that it’s more than just the ordinary mistake, but it’s not criminal behavior, and find different words to– to describe that.

The problem with this explanation is the title of Comey’s book and the theme of his media tour. A Higher Loyalty purports to teach lessons about the need to apply ethics and values to leadership decisions, and Comey spends most of his time unloading on Trump — and not without some cause, either. However, Comey consistently avoids doing the same thing with Hillary Clinton, and this is a key case in point.

Comey wanted to find a middle ground to describe what Clinton did, clearly as a way to justify ending the investigation without charging her. Note his consternation over the language of the statute when it was pointed out to him, referring to its 100-year age as an excuse to dismiss it — even though it remains the law that he’s supposed to enforce. Comey almost explicitly admits here that he changed the terminology in his letter to avoid pressing for prosecution by the Department of Justice.

Perhaps that was the proper legal choice, although it’s more accurate to call it prosecutorial discretion, which Comey’s job description didn’t include. Even so, Comey’s no longer lecturing America on legalities, but on morals, values, and ethics. Hillary Clinton’s use of the secret e-mail server was purposefully chosen in order to hide her communications from Congress and the courts, and she allowed the State Department to stonewall both for years when Congress and FOIA demands were presented. It was an ethically and politically corrupt scheme to undermine legitimate oversight of the State Department under her watch, demonstrating contempt for both Congress and the courts. And it was done to protect Hillary Clinton’s electoral viability for 2016, among other potential motivations, which would have colored the results of the election had it not been exposed by the Select Committee on Benghazi.

That’s not extreme carelessness or gross negligence, morally and ethically speaking. It’s deliberate corruption, even if it’s not enough to prosecute. So why doesn’t Comey call it out as such while he’s making ethical and values arguments against Trump and his allies?

Leave a comment

Continue Reading

News

Obama’s Former Director of National Intelligence Says Obama Behind Entire Russia Witch Hunt!

Published

on

By

Guest post by Joe Hoft

President Obama’s former Director of National Intelligence, James Clapper, came clean on CNN and stated that former President Obama was behind spying on President Trump!

James Clapper was on CNN yesterday and he stated that Obama was behind spying on President Trump and all the corrupt and criminal actions involving the government, including the Mueller investigation –

According to Obama’s former spy chief, James Clapper, who appeared on CNN to say it was Obama who set the entire Russia witch-hunt into motion by tasking the intelligence community assessment.

Clapper said –

If it weren’t for President Obama we might not have done the intelligence community assessment that we did that set up a whole sequence of events which are still unfolding today including Special Counsel Mueller’s investigation.  President Obama is responsible for that.  It was he who tasked us to do that intelligence community assessment in the first place.

The cat is out of the bag.

Leave a comment

Continue Reading

News

Sunday morning talking heads

Published

on

By

It’s a special day on the Sunday shows when socialism’s new superstar drops by to show off her intellectual chops.

She’ll be on “Face the Nation” along with her idol, Bernie Sanders, as they campaign together in Kansas for a progressive Democrat running for Mike Pompeo’s old House seat. Why they’re wasting their time there, I have no idea: It’s a R+15 district. Presumably the idea is to draw big crowds so that other socialist candidates across the country can point to it and say, “See? Even in the heartland they want hard-leftism.”

Otherwise it’s likely to be wall-to-wall chatter about Trump and Putin today. Adam Schiff will be the lead guest on “This Week,” where he’ll say Adam-Schiff-type things about collusion and kompromat. The top-billed Republican, meanwhile, is Marco Rubio, who took some heat this week after claiming that he was satisfied with POTUS’s “I said ‘would’ when I meant to say ‘wouldn’t’” walkback of the Putin press conference. He’ll sit down with “Face the Nation” and “State of the Union” for some “Are you serious?” questions and will also likely be pressed on Trump’s commitment to NATO. Rubio’s a hawk of almost McCain-ian proportions, but unlike McCain he has a long career ahead of him potentially and therefore needs to stay on Trump’s good side. He’ll do his best this morning to be diplomatic with his criticism of the president’s NATO skepticism.

If you can stand it, John Kerry will also be on “Face the Nation” to condemn Trump for not showing as much strength towards an enemy as Kerry himself did with, er, Iran. The full line-up is at the AP.

Leave a comment

Continue Reading

News

DEVELOPING: DOJ Releasing Docs Related to FISA Warrants on Carter Page

Published

on

By

On Friday, conservative watchdog group Judicial Watch announced documents related to the FISA warrants on Trump’s former campaign advisor, Carter Page were released by the FBI — and were on the way to JW headquarters.

Almost one year ago to the day, Judicial Watch filed a FOIA lawsuit against the DOJ for the following documents:

Copies of all proposed and all final signed FISA applications submitted to the FISC relating to Russian interference in the 2016 election, allegations of collusion between people associated with the Trump campaign and Russia, and any known Trump associates regardless of context;

Copies of all FISC responses to the above-mentioned applications in which the Court notified the FBI or Justice Department that it would not grant the proposed applications or recommended changes. If any such FISC responses were provided orally, rather than in writing, please provide copies of FBI or Justice Department records memorializing or otherwise referencing the relevant FISC responses;

Copies of all FISC orders relating to the above mentioned applications, whether denying the applications and certifications, denying the orders, modifying the orders, granting the orders, or other types of orders.

Obama’s Deep State FBI and DOJ obtained a FISA warrant on Carter Page in October of 2016 and three subsequent renewals in order to spy on Trump’s campaign and transition team.

Comey, Rosenstein, McCabe and Sally Yates all signed the FISA applications even though Hillary’s fraudulent Russia dossier was used as a pretext to obtain the warrants.

“Judicial Watch may finally get the infamous spy warrants the Obama administration and Deep State used while conspiring with the Clinton campaign to target then-candidate and now President Trump. It took a year, but the stonewall and cover-up, we hope, begins to end today,” Judicial Watch president Tom Fitton said.


Tom Fitton updated and said the docs were Fed Ex’ed.

Fitton appeared on Fox News early Saturday morning to discuss the new development.

Tom Fitton expects the documents to have redactions, however he said on Fox News, “I suspect we’ll get more answers. We won’t get all the answers we want, so the fight will continue.”

VIDEO:

The new FISA warrant documents have not been released at the time of this publication, however; The Gateway Pundit will update as soon as the documents are available.

Update: Tom Fitton says he expects to receive the corrupt FISA docs by Monday.

You can support Judicial Watch by clicking here.

Leave a comment

Continue Reading
Advertisement

Like us on Facebook

Advertisement

Trending

Close